right2freedom

acordion

Measures Introduced Due To Corona Virus

mandatory face covering in shops, retail setting and public transport
restriction of movement (5 km)
limited number of people attending funerals, weddings, masses
limited number of people at public gatherings
prohibited family reunions
restricted activities of small and medium businesses
restrictions in public transport (fewer seats, masks)

Community And Family Socialisation Consequences

the inability to visit family and friends outside of the 5 km
the inability to visit family and friends who are in nursing homes
negative impact on the socialisation of young people during adolescence
selective approval of gatherings (e.g., schools remain open)
inability of the father to be present during childbirth
inability of hospital visits even in case the patient is dying

Economic Consequences

economic collapse and instability
increase in the number of homeless people (incomes decreased, living costs remained the same, which leads to an increased number of homeless people)
irrelevant classification of essential products, businesses, and services

Health-related Consequences

neglect of other diseases giving priority to the coronavirus
(official study) consequence of wearing a mask (bacteria, difficulty breathing)
impairment of mental health, which directly causes an increased number of suicides, alcoholism, and drug abuse
non-publication and censorship of studies on the positive effects of hydroxychloroquine
inadequate utilisation of medical and healthcare staff
irrelevant restrictions for potential carriers and impact on them

Breaches On Social Networks

limited access to information
selective censorship on and by social networks
censorship of free speech, thought-sharing, and any sort of independently formed opinions that are not in line with the mainstream media and their narrative
direct blocking and prevention of expressing the opposite opinion (groups, profiles, and channels are being blocked/removed)

Breaches On Mass Media And Mainstream Tv

information control and selective sharing of information
spreading panic and fear
no space in the media for debates and alternative views

Professional Literature

lack of relevant medical studies
labelling and discrediting experts of the opposite opinion
hydroxychloroquine

Fact-Checkers

restriction of freedom of opinion and speech without objective checks and evidence
funded by private organisations
not acting in the best interest of the public (instead of educating and providing reliable sources, they are discrediting non-mainstream statements/people)

Consequences On Freedom Of Speech

demoralization of people due to the inability to access various information
use media to promote solutions and effective prevention of the disease instead of promoting negative outcomes and presenting irrelevant statistics

Covid-19 Testing

expert opinion on the PCR test (this test should never be used for diagnostic purposes, and it is highly unreliable)
reconsideration of the need for the introduction of health passports
reviewing the reasons and pressures for mass testing and familiarisation with the possible background (mass DNA collection)

Needs Of Restrictive Measures

whether it is logical to introduce these restrictions due to the virus that causes fewer deaths than the seasonal flu (survival rate is extremely low – so much it is negligible)
the paradox of reality between COVID and seasonal flu
similarity between self-isolation measures/national lockdown and house arrest
whether the goal of these measures is a social or physical distance (the phrase “social distance” is used, why?)
should we consider the “New Normal” as normal?

Our Goals

file claims against specific publishers, news portals, and others who remove/censor articles without carrying out proper research
flag and report fake news that is published to scare and deceit the public
collaboration with legal experts in order to educate our legal team
mass promotion of knowledge of personal rights and their protection based on legal advice
change of the approach: we demand that protective epidemiological measures (masks, gloves, sanitizers) be adopted based on verified studies and professional research and not on a subjective initiative
reopening of all businesses that, based on relevant studies, do not contribute to the spread of the disease (instead of closing them on a subjective initiative)
making a clear distinction between recommended and necessary by taking into account different opinions, recommendations, and conclusions based on evidence and studies
review of restrictive measures: their efficiency, functionality, and way of implementation
reanalysis of restrictive measures and their impact on the economy
examination of the maximum level of socialization (the “old normal”) and cultural and social life in accordance with the realistic COVID-19 guide
abolition of all classification of essential products, businesses, and services
adoption of non-selective measures for protection and prevention against COVID-19
publishing of all studies on positive treatments of COVID-19 cases
educating the masses on various sources of information and promoting accessibility to different sources of information
comparison of models of protection measures of different countries and their effectiveness in practice

Send this to a friend